Types

Classic, hybrid, unit-linked – how do they differ?

Pension insurance is a legal wrapper hosting three savings logics. Here are the three types and the cost concepts – with no premiums or return figures: those come from competing offers at quote time.

The three types

Type

Classic (traditional)

The predictability route: the insurer manages the savings under rules fixed in the policy terms, with a technical interest rate and surplus-sharing rules.

  • Calculation basis fixed in the terms (technical rate)
  • No fund selection – the insurer manages the investment
  • Predictability focus, more modest growth potential

Detailed article →

Type

Hybrid designs

Middle-ground solutions: a predictable element combined with investment units – the emphasis varies by product.

  • Partly fixed, partly investment-driven logic
  • Typically a limited fund selection
  • A middle path in risk and flexibility

Detailed article →

Type

Unit-linked

Your savings work in asset funds you choose – more opportunity and more responsibility: the client bears the investment risk.

  • Wide fund palette, rebalancing options
  • Higher long-term growth potential – without promises
  • Values fluctuate; the outcome is not fixed in advance

Detailed article →

All three types live in the same tax framework: the 20% tax credit (with its annual cap) can be claimed on each, under the rules in force.

Quick comparison

AspectClassicHybridUnit-linked
Who bears the investment risk?Typically the insurer (per the terms)Shared, design-dependentThe client
Where does the money work?In the insurer's managed portfolioFixed element + asset fundsIn asset funds you choose
Best suited for…Those who put predictability firstThose seeking a middle pathThose who accept fluctuation long term
Maintenance needLowMediumAnnual allocation check advised
Tax credit✓✓✓

This comparison is indicative; exact workings are governed by the insurers' current policy terms. The two key questions are your remaining horizon and your risk tolerance – the 2-minute quiz helps with both.

Cost concepts worth understanding before signing

TKM – the total cost indicator

TKM is a cost indicator with a uniform methodology: it began as insurer self-regulation (the MABISZ TKM Charter, 2010), and since 1 January 2016 its calculation and publication have been mandated by MNB Decree 55/2015 (XII. 22.). It shows the annual cost burden your savings carry in a model policy, for given terms. It exists to compare products – on identical terms. We deliberately publish no specific TKM values here: the offer table shows the ranges, calculated for your term. Details: the TKM article.

Initial units and acquisition costs

Many products register the first years' premiums as a separate unit type with higher deductions – which is why early surrender is typically the worst deal. What this means exactly: cost components in plain language.

Bonus and loyalty credits

Many products reward long-term persistence with credits – typically conditional (term, continuous premium payment). Bonuses refine the TKM picture but do not override it: bonuses on the scales.

Indexation

The anniversary premium increase is a value-following tool: it helps your savings keep pace with inflation. It is typically not compulsory to accept – decision criteria: indexation at the anniversary.

Not sure which type fits you? Take the 2-minute quiz – it gives direction, without prices or promises – or let's discuss it live: free 20-minute consultation →

Let's talk it through in 20 minutes.

Free of charge and without obligation – by the end you will see your options and the next step clearly.

Book an appointment